RUMFORD CHEM. WKS. v. HYGIENIC CHEM. CO.

Nos. 9, 121.

215 U.S. 156 (1909)

RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS v. HYGIENIC CHEMICAL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY. HYGIENIC CHEMICAL COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 29, 1909.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Philip Mauro, with whom Mr. C.A.L. Massie was on the brief, for Rumford Chemical Works.

Mr. Edwin T. Rice, with whom Mr. Willard Parker Butler was on the brief, for the Hygienic Chemical Companies.


MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

These are two suits in equity brought by the Rumford Chemical Company for the infringement of a patent for baking powders; one, No. 9, brought in the Third Circuit, New Jersey, against the Hygienic Chemical Company, a corporation of that State; the other, No. 121, brought in the Second Circuit, New York, against a New York corporation of the same name. The two cases were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases