EAST CENT. E.M. CO. v. CENTRAL EUREKA CO.

No. 141.

204 U.S. 266 (1907)

EAST CENTRAL EUREKA MINING COMPANY v. CENTRAL EUREKA MINING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 1907.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, with whom Mr. Philip G. Galpin, Mr. Frederick L. Siddons and Mr. William E. Richardson were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. S.S. Burdett, with whom Mr. Curtis H. Lindley and Mr. Henry Eickhoff were on the brief, for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to reverse a decree in favor of the defendant in error, the original plaintiff and hereinafter called the plaintiff, which was ordered by the Superior Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court of California. 146 California, 147. The decree was made on a bill to quiet title, upon the following facts, which...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases