1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 206 U.S.
  5. 206 U.S. 181 (1907)
 

YATES v. UTICA BANK

Nos. 231, 232, 233.

206 U.S. 181 (1907)

YATES v. UTICA BANK. SAME v. BAILEY. SAME v. BANK OF STAPLEHURST.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 13, 1907.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Halleck F. Rose and Mr. J.W. Deweese, with whom Mr. Frank E. Bishop was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.1

Mr. Lionel C. Burr and Mr. John J. Thomas, with whom Mr. Charles L. Burr, Mr. Richard S. Norvall and Mr. William B.C. Brown were on the brief, for defendants in error.1

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

These are the actions referred to in the opinion just announced in No. 230, Yates v. Jones National Bank, as companion actions with that case and as having been tried with it. The issues raised below and the questions of law which here arise for decision, are, therefore, the same as in No. 230, and the reasons given in the opinion in that case require a reversal of the judgments in these.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases