NEW HAVEN R.R. v. INTERSTATE COM. COM.

Nos. 24, 27.

200 U.S. 361 (1906)

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 19, 1906.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John W. Daniel, with whom Mr. Fred Harper was on the brief, for New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, appellant in No. 24 and appellee in No. 27.

Mr. John W. Griggs also for New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.

Mr. Randolph Harrison, with whom Mr. A.R. Long was on the brief, for the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, appellee in No. 27.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds, with whom Mr. William A. Day was on the brief, for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellee in No. 24 and appellant in No. 27.


MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

Following an inquiry begun in consequence of a complaint to it made, the Interstate Commerce Commission, through the Attorney General of the United States, filed under the act to further regulate commerce (32 Stat. 847), in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, this proceeding against the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases