1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 201 U.S.
  5. 201 U.S. 184 (1906)
 

BROWN v. GURNEY

Nos. 97, 98 and 99.

201 U.S. 184 (1906)

BROWN v. GURNEY. SMALL v. BROWN. BROWN v. SMALL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 2, 1906.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William C. Prentiss, with whom Mr. Charles F. Potter and Mr. Horace F. Clark were on the brief, for Brown, plaintiff in error in Nos. 97 and 99, and defendant in error in No. 98.

Mr. Charles C. Butler, with whom Mr. J.C. Helm was on the brief, for Gurney, defendant in error in No. 97, submitted.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The question in these cases, which was intended to be, and was, passed upon, is when, in respect of the three locations, did the premises in controversy become subject to location?

In the state Supreme Court, counsel for Brown contended that the judgments below must be affirmed because the agreed facts failed to identify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases