EX PARTE NATIONAL ENAMELING AND STAMPING COMPANY

No. 17, Original.

201 U.S. 156 (1906)

EX PARTE NATIONAL ENAMELING AND STAMPING COMPANY, PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 19, 1906.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Marshall, with whom Mr. Arthur v. Briesen and Mr. Walter D. Evans were on the brief, for petitioners.

Mr. Philip Mauro, with whom Mr. Harold Binney and Mr. C.A.L. Massie were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 18, original, argued simultaneously herewith.1

Mr. Robert N. Kenyon, with whom Mr. Walter F. Rogers and Mr. Jacob Steinhardt were on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. W. Clyde Jones, with whom Mr. John Ridout was on the brief, for respondent in No. 18, original, argued simultaneously herewith.1


MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree entered by the Circuit Court was interlocutory and not final. Barnard v. Gibson, 7 How. 650; Humiston v. Stainthorp, 2 Wall. 106, and cases cited in note; Estey v. Burdett, 109 U.S. 633, 637; McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Railway Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases