1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 196 U.S.
  5. 196 U.S. 152 (1905)
 

WOLFF v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 62.

196 U.S. 152 (1905)

WOLFF v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 3, 1905.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John C. Gittings, with whom Mr. D.W. Baker was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. E.H. Thomas, with whom Mr. Andrew B. Duvall was on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The first contention of plaintiff in error is that the stone was an unlawful obstruction, per se. This is deduced as a consequence from section 222 of the Revised Statutes of the District of Columbia, which reads as follows:

"No open space, public reservation, or other public grounds in the city of Washington,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases