1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 195 U.S.
  5. 195 U.S. 194 (1904)
 

AIKENS v. WISCONSIN

Nos. 3, 4, 5.

195 U.S. 194 (1904)

AIKENS v. WISCONSIN. HUEGIN v. WISCONSIN. HOYT v. WISCONSIN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Reargued October 17, 1904.

Decided November 7, 1904.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W.H. Timlin and Mr. Goerge D. Van Dyke for plaintiffs in error in Nos. 3 and 4.

Mr. S.S. Gregory, with whom Mr. Conrad H. Poppenhusen and Mr. Joseph L. McNab were on the brief, for plaintiff in error, in No. 5.

Mr. James G. Flanders, with whom Mr. LaFayette M. Sturdevant, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, was on the brief, for defendant in error in Nos. 3, 4. Submitted by Mr. Sturdevant, for defendant in error in No. 5.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

These are three writs of error to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, brought to set aside convictions and sentences of the plaintiffs in error, the defendants below, upon informations filed by the District Attorney. 113 Wisconsin, 419. The ground of the writs is that the proceedings violated the rights of the plaintiffs in error under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases