THE CONEMAUGH

No. 97.

189 U.S. 363 (1903)

THE CONEMAUGH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 9, 1903.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. C.E. Kremer for petitioner. Mr. F.C. Harvey and Mr. W.O. Johnson were on the brief.

Mr. Harvey D. Goulder for respondent. Mr. S.H. Holding and Mr. F.S. Masten were on the brief.

Mr. Wilhemus Mynderse for intervenors. Mr. F.H. Canfield was on the brief.


MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

1. One main and several subsidiary propositions are asserted by petitioner. The main proposition is that in all cases of collision, if both vessels are in fault, the damages resulting are to be equally divided between the owners of the vessels.

The subsidiary propositions are that if one of the offending vessels pay more than half the damages to a third or innocent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases