1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 190 U.S.
  5. 190 U.S. 40 (1903)
 

WRIGHT v. HENKEL

No. 661.

190 U.S. 40 (1903)

WRIGHT v. HENKEL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 1, 1903.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Untermyer and Mr. Louis Marshall for appellant.

Mr. Charles Fox for His Britannic Majesty's consul general at New York, appellee.

Mr. Solicitor Genl. Hoyt, with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney Genl. Purdy was on the brief, on behalf of the United States.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of habeas corpus cannot perform the office of a writ of error, but the court issuing the writ may inquire into the jurisdiction of the committing magistrate in extradition proceedings, Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502; Terlinden v. Ames,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases