TULLOCK v. MULVANE

No. 59.

184 U.S. 497 (1902)

TULLOCK v. MULVANE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 3, 1902.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W.H. Rossington for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles Blood Smith and Mr. Clifford Histed were on his brief.

Mr. N.H. Loomis for defendant in error. Mr. A.L. Williams was on his brief.


MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The assignments of error, though fourteen in number, are reducible to three propositions.

1. A contention that as the bond provided for a liability only in case it was finally decided that the injunction was wrongfully granted, no recovery could be had upon the bond, because the stipulation between the complainants and certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases