1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 186 U.S.
  5. 186 U.S. 365 (1902)
 

WARNER v. GODFREY

No. 191.

186 U.S. 365 (1902)

WARNER v. GODFREY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 2, 1902.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. J.J. Darlington and Mr. William F. Mattingly for appellants.

Mr. John G. Johnson for appellees.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The main asserted badges of fraud upon which the complainant based her contention that the conveyance by Dutton to Richardson on April 13, 1896, should be treated, so far as the complainant was concerned, as a nullity, were: 1. The gross inadequacy of a consideration; 2. A prior agency of the firm of B.H. Warner & Co., for the sale of the lots on behalf of the complainant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases