CHAMBERLIN v. BROWNING

No. 251.

177 U.S. 605 (1900)

CHAMBERLIN v. BROWNING.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 14, 1900.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. O.B. Hallam for appellants.

Mr. Arthur Peter and Mr. A.A. Birney for appellees. Mr. James S. Edwards was on their brief.


MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

Along with an argument upon the merits, counsel for the appellees have presented a motion to dismiss this appeal as to all the appellees, because of the absence of any controversy involving the requisite jurisdictional amount. This motion we find to be well taken.

The decree appealed from affected only the defendants, who, as attaching creditors, had prosecuted actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases