CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND &C. RAILWAY v. STURM

No. 236.

174 U.S. 710 (1899)

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STURM.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 22, 1899.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W.F. Evans and Mr. M.A. Low for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

How proceedings in garnishment may be availed of in defence — whether in abatement or bar of the suit on the debt attached or for a continuance of it or suspension of execution — the practice of the States of the Union is not uniform. But it is obvious and necessary justice that such proceedings should be allowed as a defence in some way.

In the pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases