1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 173 U.S.
  5. 173 U.S. 509 (1899)
 

NICOL v. AMES

Nos. 435 and 4 Original argued, and Nos. 625 and 636.

173 U.S. 509 (1899)

NICOL v. AMES. In re NICHOLS. SKILLEN v. AMES. INGWERSEN v. UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 3, 1899.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry S. Robbins and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellants in Nos. 625 and 435, and for petitioner in No. 4 Original.

Mr. John S. Miller and Mr. Merritt Starr for plaintiff in error in No. 636.

Mr. Solicitor General for appellee in Nos. 625 and 435, and for defendants in error in No. 636.

MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

These cases may be considered together, because they involve substantially the same question, only the last one includes, in addition, a question of construction as distinguished from a question of the validity of the statute.

That portion of the act which is involved is set forth in the margin.1 30 Stat...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases