1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 166 U.S.
  5. 166 U.S. 463 (1897)
 

BANK OF COMMERCE v. SEATTLE

Nos. 223, 224, 225, 226.

166 U.S. 463 (1897)

BANK OF COMMERCE v. SEATTLE. SEATTLE BANK v. SEATTLE. PUGET SOUND BANK v. SEATTLE. WASHINGTON BANK v. KING COUNTY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 12, 1897.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold Preston for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Eugene M. Carr and Mr. James B. Howe were with him on the briefs.

Mr. Andrew F. Burleigh for defendants in error in No. 226. Mr. James A. Haight and Mr. Samuel Piles were on his briefs.

Mr. John K. Brown for defendants in error in Nos. 223, 224 and 225. Mr. John B. Allen and Mr. F.B. Tipton were on his briefs.

MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court.

The bills of complaint in these cases are substantially of the same legal import, so far as any Federal question is concerned, with that considered in the case of The First National Bank of Aberdeen v. The County of Chehalis, ante, 440, in which the opinion of this court has just been delivered.

The only difference that we notice is that, in connection with the allegation that there existed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases