1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 166 U.S.
  5. 166 U.S. 258 (____)
 

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. CHICAGO

No. 130. Argued with No. 129.

166 U.S. 258 (____)

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHICAGO.

Supreme Court of United States.

No. 130. Argued with No. 129. Ante, 226, 228.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding for condemnation under the constitution and laws of Illinois similar to the one just disposed of. For the reasons stated in the above case, No. 129, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER dissenting.

I dissent from the judgments in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases