1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 161 U.S.
  5. 161 U.S. 246 (1896)
 

BALTZER AND TAAKS v. NORTH CAROLINA

No. 52.

161 U.S. 246 (1896)

BALTZER AND TAAKS v. NORTH CAROLINA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 2, 1896.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Simon Sterne for plaintiff in error.

Mr. James E. Shepherd and Mr. Charles M. Busbee, (with whom was Mr. F.I. Osborne on the brief,) for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

The claim presented in this case to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina differs somewhat from that relied on in that court in the case of Hermann R. Baltzer v. The State of North Carolina, No. 93 of the docket of this court. The question of the power in the state court to give the relief prayed for was by it decided adversely to the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases