1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 164 U.S.
  5. 164 U.S. 179 (1896)
 

TREGEA v. MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

No. 18.

164 U.S. 179 (1896)

TREGEA v. MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 16, 1896.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas B. Bond for plaintiff in error. Mr. J.J. Scrivner and Mr. George W. Schell were on his brief.

Mr. John H. Boalt, as Amicus Curiæ, filed a brief in the interest of plaintiff in error.

Mr. A.L. Rhodes for defendant in error.

Mr. Benjamin Harrison for defendant in error.

Mr. C.C. Wright for defendant in error. Mr. Joseph H. Call was on his brief.

Mr. John F. Dillon for defendant in error. Mr. Harry Hubbard and Mr. John M. Dillon were on his brief.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

A motion was made to dismiss this case on the ground of the lack of a Federal question. It appears from the opinion of the Supreme Court of the State that the defendant contended before it that the attempt to bind the reconstituted district — that is, the district diminished by the exclusion of 28,000 acres, and in which his property was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases