SALTONSTALL v. WIEBUSCH

No. 150.

156 U.S. 601 (1895)

SALTONSTALL v. WIEBUSCH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 4, 1895.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Whitney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Francis Lynde Stetson for defendant in error. Mr. Charles P. Searle, Mr. Albert Comstock, and Mr. Everit Brown were on his brief.


MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case raises the single question whether the pincers, grass-hooks, and scythes, which constituted this importation, should have been classified as manufactures of metal, or forgings of iron or steel. All the articles were made of forged steel.

There was no evidence in this case that the word "forgings" was used in any commercial or technical sense among manufacturers, and, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases