ANVIL MINING COMPANY v. HUMBLE

No. 323.

153 U.S. 540 (1894)

ANVIL MINING COMPANY v. HUMBLE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 14, 1894.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel H. Ball and Mr. James G. Flanders for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Edwin F. Uhl, (with whom were Mr. Frank Kutts and Mr. Birney Hoyt on the brief,) for defendants in error.


MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The claims of the respective parties, as stated by the court in its charge to the jury, are briefly these: Plaintiffs claimed, first, an amount unpaid for ore mined in September and October; second, wages which they had paid during certain periods when they were delayed in the prosecution of the work...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases