1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 155 U.S.
  5. 155 U.S. 13 (1894)
 

ROBB v. VOS

No. 38.

155 U.S. 13 (1894)

ROBB v. VOS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 15, 1894.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward Colston, (with whom were Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. George Hoadly, Jr., on the brief,) for appellants.

Mr. Gustavus A. Wald and Mr. A.B. Huston, (with whom was Mr. W. Austin Goodman on the brief,) for Vos, appellee.

Mr. Gustavus A. Wald and Mr. Charles B. Wilby filed a brief for Stix, appellee.

MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

As the proceedings in the Gugenheim case were regular upon their face, and extrinsic evidence was required to show their invalidity, we think a court of equity was the proper tribunal to afford effectual relief. Slater v. Maxwell, 6 Wall. 268; Cocks v. Izard, 7 Wall. 559; Oelrichs v. Spain, 15 Wall. 211...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases