CARR v. QUIGLEY


149 U.S. 652 (1893)

CARR v. QUIGLEY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 15, 1893.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A.B. Browne, (with whom were Mr. A.T. Britton and Mr. F.H. Waterman on the brief,) for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Michael Mullany for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE FIELD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defence upon which the defendant below relied on both trials, was that the land patented to the railroad company was within the boundaries of a Mexican grant, the validity of which was at the time under consideration by the Federal tribunals and was, therefore, reserved from sale when the patent was issued. Evidence to establish this fact was offered on the first trial, but rejected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases