CROTTY v. UNION MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO.

No. 248.

144 U.S. 621 (1892)

CROTTY v. UNION MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 18, 1892.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. J.H. Drummond for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

Without noticing other questions discussed by counsel, it is sufficient to consider that of plaintiff's interest in the policy. It is the settled law of this court that a claimant under a life insurance policy must have an insurable interest in the life of the insured. Wagering contracts in insurance have been repeatedly denounced. Cammack v. Lewis, 15 Wall. 643, in which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases