INTERSTATE COM. COMMISS. v. B. & O. RAILROAD

No. 889.

145 U.S. 263 (1892)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 16, 1892.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Shellabarger and Mr. Alfred G. Safford (with whom were Mr. Attorney General and Mr. J.M. Wilson on the brief) for appellant.

Mr. John K. Cowen and Mr. Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for appellee.


MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the court.

Prior to the enactment of the act of February 4, 1887, to regulate commerce, commonly known as the Interstate Commerce Act, 24 Stat. 379, c. 104, railway traffic in this country was regulated by the principles of the common law applicable to common carriers, which demanded little more than that they should carry for all persons who applied, in the order in which the goods...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases