1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 140 U.S.
  5. 140 U.S. 184 (1891)
 

ST. PAUL PLOW WORKS v. STARLING

No. 329.

140 U.S. 184 (1891)

ST. PAUL PLOW WORKS v. STARLING.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 11, 1891.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter H. Sanborn for plaintiff in error.

Mr. L.L. Bond also filed a brief for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Charles S. Cairns for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant contends (1) that the contract of December 17, 1877, did not bind the plaintiff to grant to the defendant the privilege of manufacturing or selling any number of Starling sulky plows, or of manufacturing or selling them for any length of time, and did not bind the defendant to manufacture or sell any number of them, or to manufacture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases