1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 137 U.S.
  5. 137 U.S. 43 (1890)
 

HARDING v. WOODCOCK

No. 29.

137 U.S. 43 (1890)

HARDING v. WOODCOCK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 3, 1890.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S. Watson and Mr. G.N. Tillman, for plaintiff in error, submitted on their brief.

Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD, after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff contended in the court below, and renews the contention here, that the plea of justification interposed by the defendant for the acts complained of, the seizure and sale of the property, having been stricken out, he is left defenceless in the action. That such would be the effect of the ruling if the declaration was one in form for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases