1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 132 U.S.
  5. 132 U.S. 501 (1889)
 

MULLER v. NORTON

No. 91.

132 U.S. 501 (1889)

MULLER v. NORTON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 9, 1889.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W. Hallett Phillips for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Sawnie Robertson also filed a brief for same.

Mr. D.A. McKnight (with whom was Mr. John Johns on the brief) for defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

The validity of the above deed in view of matters apparent on its face constitutes the only question for consideration. We think that question is determined by the principle laid down in Cunningham v. Norton, 125 U.S. 77, which reversed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases