HUME v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 102, 103.

132 U.S. 406 (1889)

HUME v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. HUME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 16, 1889.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert Christy and Mr. John C. Fay for Hume.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for the United States.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court:

In his celebrated judgment in Earl of Chesterfield v. Janssen, 2 Ves. Sen. 125, 155, Lord Hardwicke arranged all the forms of fraud, recognized by equity, in four classes, the first two of which he gives in these words:

"1. Then fraud, which is dolus malus, may be actual, arising from facts and circumstances of imposition; which is the plainest case. 2. It may be apparent from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases