BOYLAN v. HOT SPRINGS RAILROAD CO.

No. 1140.

132 U.S. 146 (1889)

BOYLAN v. HOT SPRINGS RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 11, 1889.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles Carroll Bonney, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. G.W. Kretzinger, for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of assumpsit, and cannot be maintained without proof of a breach of contract by the defendant to carry the plaintiff. The only contract between the parties was an express one, signed by the plaintiff himself as well as by the defendant's agent at Chicago, and contained in a ticket for a passage to Hot Springs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases