ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. CRANDAL


120 U.S. 527 (1887)

ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY v. CRANDAL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 7, 1887.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Emerson B. Tuttle for plaintiff in error cited.

Mr. George C. Fry for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

The refusal of the court to instruct the jury, at the close of the plaintiff's evidence, that she was not entitled to recover, cannot be assigned for error, because the defendant at the time of requesting such an instruction had not rested its case, but afterwards went on and introduced evidence in its own behalf. Grand Trunk Railway v. Cummings,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases