1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 121 U.S.
  5. 121 U.S. 310 (1887)
 

HUISKAMP v. MOLINE WAGON CO.

121 U.S. 310 (1887)

HUISKAMP v. MOLINE WAGON CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 18, 1887.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James Hagerman for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. C.M. Osborn and Mr. S.A. Lynde for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case as reported above, delivered the opinion of the court.

Although the transaction between Rummel and Huiskamp Brothers may have been the subject of the trial on the plea in abatement, we are of opinion that the evidence in question was improperly admitted. In order to invalidate the mortgage of Rummel to Huiskamp Brothers it must have been made with the intent, on the part of Rummel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases