Mr. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.
It is conceded that the damages for which the court rendered its decree were allowed for the infringement of the first claim only of the Rosner patent, which, therefore, is alone to be considered upon this appeal.
The invention covered by this claim was described as follows in the specification:
"This invention consists in combining with a set of permutation
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.