1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 113 U.S.
  5. 113 U.S. 27 (1885)
 

BARBIER v. CONNOLLY

113 U.S. 27 (1885)

BARBIER v. CONNOLLY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 5, 1885.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A.C. Searle, Mr. H.G. Sieberst and Mr. Alfred Clarke for plaintiff in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court. He recited the facts as above stated, and continued:

In this case we can only consider whether the fourth section of the ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco is in conflict with the Constitution or laws of the United States. We cannot pass upon the conformity of that section with the requirements of the Constitution of the State. Our jurisdiction is confined...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases