RICHMOND MINING CO. v. EUREKA MINING CO.


103 U.S. 839 (____)

RICHMOND MINING COMPANY v. EUREKA MINING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel M. Wilson and Mr. Thomas Wren for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Harry I. Thornton, contra.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon the facts set forth in the preceding statement we have had no difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the judgment of the court below, sustaining the title of the Eureka company, was right. To our minds there cannot be a doubt that the compromise line was intended to fix permanently the boundary between the mining properties of the two companies at that point. The Richmond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases