1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 103 U.S.
  5. 103 U.S. 764 (____)
 

HINCKLEY v. MORTON

103 U.S. 764 (____)

HINCKLEY v. MORTON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motions.

Mr. Leonard Swett and Mr. Philip Phillips, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

Our jurisdiction of this case is clear. The appeal is not from the decree entered on our mandate at the last term in Hinckley v. Railroad Company, 100 U.S. 153. On the contrary, that decree has been satisfied by an actual payment of the amount found due. The case does not, therefore, come within the rule laid down in Stewart v. Salamon (97 id. 361), where we held that an appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases