1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 103 U.S.
  5. 103 U.S. 278 (____)
 

BONDURANT v. WATSON

103 U.S. 278 (____)

BONDURANT, TUTRIX, v. WATSON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel R. Walker for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Edwin T. Merrick and Mr. George W. Race, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

We have no jurisdiction in this case, as no writ of error has ever been issued. Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 355. By the ninth section of the act of May 8, 1792, c. 36 (1 Stat. 278), it was made the duty of the clerk of this court to transmit to the clerks of the several courts the form of a writ of error approved by two of the justices of this court. This was done, and the form adopted required the writ to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases