1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 59 U.S.
  5. 59 U.S. 396 (1855)
 

SOUTH ET AL. v. STATE OF MARYLAND, USE OF POTTLE

59 U.S. 396 (1855)

18 How. 396

DANIEL SOUTH, JOHN W. STOUFFER, JACOB FIERY, DANIEL MIDDLEKAUFF, SENIOR, AND JOHN A.K. BREWER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF MARYLAND, USE OF JONATHAN W. POTTLE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was again argued at this term by Mr. Nelson, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Dobbin and Mr. Johnson, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in the court below, and the defendant moved, in arrest of judgment, "that the matters set out in the declaration of the plaintiff are not sufficient, in law, to support the action." If it be found that the court erred in overruling this motion and in entering judgment on the verdict, a consideration of the other points...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases