HAM v. STATE OF MISSOURI


59 U.S. 126 (1855)

18 How. 126

ADAM HAM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF MISSOURI.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Geyer, for the plaintiff in error, no counsel appearing for the defendant.


Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon a writ of error to the supreme court of the State, under the authority of the 25th section of the judiciary act.

The proceedings now under review were founded upon an indictment in the circuit court of the county of St. Francis, against the plaintiff in error, for having committed waste and trespass on the sixteenth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases