JOURDAN ET AL. v. BARRETT ET AL


45 U.S. 169 (1846)

4 How. 169

NOEL JOURDAN AND JOSEPH LANDRY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THOMAS BARRETT ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Coxe, for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Crittenden, for the defendant.


Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

The record brings before us two petitory actions; one of Landry against Barrett; and the other of Jourdan against the same defendant. The State District Court of Louisiana adjudged the title of Barrett the better, and for this reason decided in his favor in both actions; but in that of Landry it was also held, that the title to the land he claimed was invalid, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases