MOORE v. THE BANK OF THE METROPOLIS


38 U.S. 302 (1839)

13 Pet. 302

THOMAS P. MOORE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, vs. THE BANK OF THE METROPOLIS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Brent, Jun., for the plaintiff in error; and by Coxe for the defendant.


Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court: —

This case comes up on a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States, for the District of Columbia, in the county of Washington.

It is an action of assumpsit, upon a promissory note, purporting to have been made by the defendant, and Richard M. Johnson, and P.H. Pope, by their attorney, George Thomas; the note, bearing date the 16th of February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases