BEACH v. VILES ET AL.


27 U.S. 675 (____)

2 Pet. 675

GEORGE BEACH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR vs. JONATHAN VILES ET AL. DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr Webster for the plaintiff in error; Mr D.A. Simmons for the defendants.


Mr Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. After stating the facts, he proceeded as follows:

The present being a suit upon a local statute, giving a particular remedy in the nature of a foreign attachment against garnishees, who possess goods, effects or credits of the principal debtor, the decisions which have been made upon the construction of that statute by the state courts, are entitled to great respect; and ought in conformity to the uniform practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases