BANK OF HAMILTON v. DUDLEY'S LESSEE


27 U.S. 492 (____)

2 Pet. 492

THE BANK OF HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR vs. THE LESSEE OF AMBROSE DUDLEY, JUN., DEFENDANT.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued for the plaintiff in error by Mr Benham and Mr Baldwin; and by Mr Garrard for the defendant.


Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause was fully argued at the last term on the validity of the deed made by the administrators; and several acts, which were supposed to illustrate that question to which it is unnecessary now to refer, were cited and relied on. As it was a question of great interest, on which many titles depended, which was to be decided entirely by the statutes of Ohio; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases