HIMELY v. ROSE.


9 U.S. 313 (1809)

5 Cranch 313

HIMELY v. ROSE.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 15, 1809.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin and Jones, for Himely, the appellant.

C. Lee, contra.

Martin and Jones, for the appellant.

C. Lee, contra.


MARSHALL, Ch. J. delivered the opinion of the court as follows:

A decree having been formerly rendered in this cause, the court is now to determine whether that decree has been executed according to its true intent and meaning.

That decree directed "the cargo of the Sarah to be restored to the original owners, subject to those charges of freight, insurance and other expenses which would have been incurred by them, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases