1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 180 N.E.3d
  5. 180 N.E.3d 1109 (2021)
 

SER RHOADS v. HAMILTON CTY. BD.

No. 2021-1123.

180 N.E.3d 1109 (2021)

165 Ohio St.3d 562

2021-Ohio-3209

The STATE EX REL. RHOADS et al. v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 16, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Markovits, Stock & DeMarco, L.L.C., and Paul M. DeMarco , for relators.

Joseph T. Deters , Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Stevenson and Jesse K. Daley , Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondents Hamilton County Board of Elections, Gwen L. McFarlin, Alex M. Triantafilou, Joseph L. Mallory, and Charles H. Gerhardt III.

The Law Firm of Curt C. Hartman, and Curt C. Hartman , for respondent CincyReform.

Andrew W. Garth , Cincinnati City Solicitor, Emily Smart Woerner , Deputy City Solicitor, and Erica Faaborg , Assistant City Solicitor, for amicus curiae, city of Cincinnati, in support of relators.

{¶ 1} In this expedited election case, four city of Cincinnati electors—relators, Brewster Rhoads, Jane Anderson, Cecil Thomas, and Jane Simon—seek a writ of mandamus to compel changes to ballot language for a proposed amendment to the Cincinnati City Charter. We grant the writ in part and deny it in part.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases