1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 4 U.S.
  5. 4 U.S. 22 (____)
 

COURSE v. STEAD

4 U.S. 22 (____)

4 Dall. 22

Course et al. versus Stead et Ux. et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Ingersoll, for the defendants in error.

By the COURT:

The objection is not sufficient to quash the writ of error. The teste may be amended by our own record of the duration of the last term; and it is, of course, amendable.

II. Ingersoll objected, that the writ of error was not directed to any Circuit Court; for, its address was "To the Judges of the Circuit Court, holden in and for the district aforesaid:" whereas no district was previously named.

Dallas, in reply, observed, that the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases