RAMIREZ v. AUTOSPORT


88 N.J. 277 (1982)

440 A.2d 1345

ERNEST RAMIREZ AND ADELE RAMIREZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. AUTOSPORT, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 4, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard Rosenstein argued the cause for appellant (Feuerstein, Sachs & Maitlin, attorneys).

Leo Kaplowitz argued the cause for respondents (Kaplowitz & Wise, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

This case raises several issues under the Uniform Commercial Code ("the Code" and "UCC") concerning whether a buyer may reject a tender of goods with minor defects and whether a seller may cure the defects. We consider also the remedies available to the buyer, including cancellation of the contract. The main issue is whether plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Ramirez, could reject the tender by defendant, Autosport, of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases