FEDOR v. NISSAN OF NORTH AMERICA

Docket No. A-6034-11T3, A-0116-12T1

74 A.3d 977 (2013)

432 N.J. Super. 303

Gene FEDOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NISSAN OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Respondent. Jingesh Ghandi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nissan of North America, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 23, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl D. Poplar argued the cause for appellants (Kimmel & Silverman and Carl D. Poplar , Cherry Hill, attorneys; Fred Davis , on the brief).

Thomas J. Sateary argued the cause for respondent (Lindabury, McCormick, Estabrook & Cooper, PC, attorneys; Mr. Sateary, of counsel and on the brief; Joshua S. Sklarin , Westfield, on the brief).

Before Judges MESSANO, LIHOTZ and OSTRER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

LIHOTZ, J.A.D.

These back-to-back appeals, filed by separate plaintiffs against the same defendant and consolidated for purposes of this opinion, present the same legal issue for review. Plaintiffs, as aggrieved consumers of new automobiles, successfully pursued relief and were granted repurchase of their vehicles through the manufacturer's informal dispute settlement mechanism...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases