1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 244 N.J.
  5. 244 N.J. Super. 254 (1990)
 

MACK AUTO IMPORTS v. JAGUAR CARS, INC.

244 N.J. Super. 254 (1990)

581 A.2d 1372

MACK AUTO IMPORTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAGUAR CARS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 7, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore Sager Meth argued the cause for appellant (Meth & Woehling, attorneys).

Douglas C. Fairhurst, of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Townley & Updike, and Stoldt & Horan, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Mack Auto Imports, Inc., an authorized dealer of Jaguar cars, commenced this action against car-maker Jaguar Cars, Inc. by filing a complaint in the New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division on September 14, 1987. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that defendant Jaguar, by limiting plaintiff's supply of cars, had violated the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, N.J.S.A. 56:10-1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases