1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 105 U.S.
  5. 105 U.S. 701 (____)
 

WURTS v. HOAGLAND

105 U.S. 701 (____)

WURTS v. HOAGLAND. IRON COMPANY v. HOAGLAND.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Theodore Little in support of the rule.

Mr. Jehiel G. Shipman, contra.

MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The controversy in these cases arose out of an assessment of benefits for the drainage of lands in New Jersey. It was decided by the Supreme Court of that State, Dec. 1, 1880. The Court of Errors and Appeals affirmed the judgment on the 18th of July, 1881, and the record was remitted Aug. 31, 1881. On receiving the remittitur on that day, the Supreme Court entered a rule ordering it to be filed and the cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases